Download , by Martin Ford

Supplying excellent book for the visitors is type of satisfaction for us. This is why, guides that we offered constantly guides with extraordinary reasons. You could take it in the sort of soft file. So, you can review , By Martin Ford quickly from some device to take full advantage of the innovation use. When you have actually decided making this publication as one of referred publication, you could provide some finest for not only your life however also your individuals around.

, by Martin Ford

Download , by Martin Ford

Preparing guides to read everyday is pleasurable for many people. However, there are still lots of people who also do not such as analysis. This is a problem. However, when you can sustain others to start reading, it will certainly be much better. One of guides that can be advised for brand-new readers is , By Martin Ford This book is not type of challenging publication to review. It can be checked out and comprehend by the new readers.

Checking out will not only provide the new understanding about just what you have reviewed. Reading will also train you to assume open minded, to do carefully, and to get over the boredom. Reviewing will be constantly good and also significant if the material that we review is additionally an excellent book. As instance, , By Martin Ford is a god book to read for you. This suggested publication turns into one of the books that will conquer a brand-new manufacturer to spend the moment wisely.

Well, have you found the way to obtain the book? Searching for , By Martin Ford in the book shop will certainly be possibly tough. This is a preferred publication as well as you could have delegated buy it, meant sold out. Have you felt bored to come over again to guide shops to understand when the local time to get it? Currently, visit this website to obtain exactly what you require. Below, we won't be sold out. The soft documents system of this book actually aids everybody to obtain the referred book.

Now, this frowned at publication is shared in the link. You have to go seeing the link and also get guide. By conserving this , By Martin Ford in the soft data kinds, you could divide it or add it right into some kinds of devices. Computer, device, or laptop computer can be option to conserve this book application. So currently, when you have currently the system of on the internet book, it's better to evoke this book to review.

Product details

File Size: 2581 KB

Print Length: 354 pages

Publisher: Basic Books (May 5, 2015)

Publication Date: May 5, 2015

Sold by: Hachette Book Group

Language: English

ASIN: B00PWX7RPG

Text-to-Speech:

Enabled

P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {

var $ttsPopover = $('#ttsPop');

popover.create($ttsPopover, {

"closeButton": "false",

"position": "triggerBottom",

"width": "256",

"popoverLabel": "Text-to-Speech Popover",

"closeButtonLabel": "Text-to-Speech Close Popover",

"content": '

});

});

X-Ray:

Enabled

P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {

var $xrayPopover = $('#xrayPop_5AF52D5E438211E983F6BB8BCE4A8FB8');

popover.create($xrayPopover, {

"closeButton": "false",

"position": "triggerBottom",

"width": "256",

"popoverLabel": "X-Ray Popover ",

"closeButtonLabel": "X-Ray Close Popover",

"content": '

});

});

Word Wise: Enabled

Lending: Not Enabled

Screen Reader:

Supported

P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {

var $screenReaderPopover = $('#screenReaderPopover');

popover.create($screenReaderPopover, {

"position": "triggerBottom",

"width": "500",

"content": '

"popoverLabel": "The text of this e-book can be read by popular screen readers. Descriptive text for images (known as “ALT text”) can be read using the Kindle for PC app if the publisher has included it. If this e-book contains other types of non-text content (for example, some charts and math equations), that content will not currently be read by screen readers.",

"closeButtonLabel": "Screen Reader Close Popover"

});

});

Enhanced Typesetting:

Enabled

P.when("jQuery", "a-popover", "ready").execute(function ($, popover) {

var $typesettingPopover = $('#typesettingPopover');

popover.create($typesettingPopover, {

"position": "triggerBottom",

"width": "256",

"content": '

"popoverLabel": "Enhanced Typesetting Popover",

"closeButtonLabel": "Enhanced Typesetting Close Popover"

});

});

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

#107,246 Paid in Kindle Store (See Top 100 Paid in Kindle Store)

I have taught Artificial Intelligence (AI) for 3 decades at a major university. Until about 10 years ago, whenever someone worried about the effect of intelligent software/hardware destroying future jobs, I would always give my "buggy whip" argument, which goes like this:"When the automobile was invented it DID destroy many jobs. Makers of buggy whips and horse troughs were put out of business. But many more NEW jobs were created to replace those older jobs. Witness all the gas stations, auto mechanic shops, car factories, etc."About 8 years ago I lost faith in the buggy whip argument. I realized that, as the technology of AI advanced, a point would be reached in which intelligent software and general-purpose robots could perform all tasks (both mental and physical) that are currently achievable only by highly educated humans. Once one intelligent robot exists with a high level of general intelligence, it can be mass produced. There have been many advances in AI in recent years (in neural networks, planning and learning systems). Machine learning systems can now learn a number of complex cognitive tasks simply by observing the past performance of human experts.I have always been an admirer of the combination of modern capitalism and (relatively) free markets as the major drivers of wealth. However, modern capitalism (with its corporations, stock and dividends) is less than a few centuries old. There is no reason to believe that it must last forever. Its "reign" over older economic systems may well end abruptly in the near future.At one time I toyed with writing a book about my concerns regarding intelligent automation and its future effect on political and economic systems but Martin Ford has a done a 100-times better job that I could have ever done. His book is very persuasive in pointing out why the "buggy whip" argument will cease to remain persuasive.I only have two complaints about Ford's book: (a) the title sounds a bit too much like a title for a pulp-fiction work and so I fear that not enough people will read it and (b) the first 75 pages consist of a standard summary of current economic facts and principles and so I fear that some readers may quit reading his book before they get to the really interesting parts, which in my opinion, start after page 75.

Martin Ford is among the technologists who have warned that technology is and will increasingly displace human beings across all employment sectors. This phenomenon will threaten the structural foundation of our capitalist economies fueled by consumer spending (that accounts for close to 70% of GDP in the US).His vision regarding the exponential growth of technology (Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, Cloud computing, Internet and mobile apps, robots) is not all that different than the vision of Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee as they expressed within their own two books on the subject: “Race Against The Machine” and “The Second Machine.”Martin Ford puts more weight into what he calls the seven deadly trends:1) Stagnant wages;2) Declining share of GDP going to labor and rising share going to corporate profits;3) Declining labor force participation rate;4) Diminishing job creation, lengthening jobless recoveries, and soaring long-term unemployment;5) Soaring inequality;6) Declining incomes and underemployment for recent college graduates; and7) Polarization and part-time jobs.Brynjolfsson and McAfee also identified the same trends. It just that Martin Ford sees those trends as potentially irreversible meanwhile the two other authors do not. Consequently, how thetwo sets of authors greatly differ is in their hope for the future of human labor.Brynjolfsson and McAfee envision that humans have a fighting chance of eventually racing with the machine instead of against it. This means they view that ultimately digital automation could complement human labor instead of substituting it. They support their argument with an iconic example “freestyle chess.” In this new discipline teams of humans and computers team up in different ways to compete against each other. They have observed that the best freestyle chess teams are not stand-alone supercomputers who could easily beat Gary Kasparov; instead they are teams of mathematicians and engineers who have developed the rare skill of analyzing freestyle chess games while guiding simultaneously two or three laptops to run their adaptative Machine Learning algorithms. Brynjolfsson and McAfee advances that this represents a model for the labor force of the future on how to race with the machine. They advance that the collaboration between human intelligence and Artificial Intelligence (AI) will always be better (or at least for some time) than AI alone. By the same token they think that IBM Watson’s medical diagnostic abilities will be much improved when teamed up with expert doctors than on a stand-alone basis.Martin Ford views things very differently. He considers the whole example of freestyle chess less than convincing even over the short term. He thinks that it is just a matter of time before AI renders humans superfluous. He sees no reason why AI would not quickly become better than humans at analyzing freestyle chess games. Similarly, he thinks IBM Watson on a stand-alone basis may not need the expertise of doctors to render superior medical diagnoses absent of human bias, flaws, and errors. Remember the entire work of Phillip Tetlock on the poor performance of experts across all fields because of overconfidence. Regarding medicine, the superiority of AI on a stand-alone basis has already been demonstrated with radiologists. AI was a lot more accurate and a heck of a lot faster at interpreting X-rays than expert radiologists were.Given their positive outlook, Brynjolfsson and McAfee recommend we invest more in education focused on what they call “ideation.” The latter embodies intellectual curiosity, creativity, ability to come up with out of the box questions (some call it lateral thinking). They view those cognitive features as uniquely human.Martin Ford, on his part, thinks that such investment in education may be good to maintain the social fiber of our society. But, it is entirely futile in terms of rendering humans able to race with the machines. Contrary to what Brynjolfsson and McAfee states, machines are already very good at many elements of ideation, creativity, exploring different solutions, etc. Machines can also be genuinely artistically creative. He gives an example whereby complex algorithms can now create wonderful classic symphonies that are competitive with the best composers. They can make modern sculptures. They can also write a surprisingly wide variety of news articles on numerous subjects. Someone in the book indicated that in a near future nearly 90% of news articles could be written by robots.Martin Ford indicates that his concerns are not his alone. For a long time, leading minds have expressed such concerns. John Maynard Keynes stated back in 1930, that technology was likely to move faster than society’s ability to create new jobs for the displaced workers within just a few generations. In 1949, Norbert Wiener, a renowned MIT mathematician expressed similar concerns in a New York Times article. He stated “if we can do anything in a clear and intelligible way, we can do it by machine… [this will lead to] an industrial revolution of unmitigated cruelty [displacing human labor].” In 1964, a team of scientists and economists wrote a report for Lyndon Johnson called “The Triple Revolution.” One of those revolutions was titled the Cybernation Revolution. Within this report they reiterated the exact same concerns expressed by Keynes and Wiener. But, no one listened. Post WW II, the US economy was experiencing a long boom where technology created a rise in productivity, living standards, and overall economic growth at all levels (technology complemented labor and did not substitute for it). However, less than a decade after the Triple Revolution report was written in 1973 rising labor productivity became completely decoupled from stagnant wages and median household income. Brynjolfsson and McAfee also wrote extensively about this “decoupling” within their books and blogs. It is just that Martin Ford does not believe those decoupling trends can be easily reversed if at all.When it comes to overall recommendations, besides education, investing in infrastructure, increasing Government investment in science and basic research, Brynjolfsson and McAfee recommend a modest increase in the Earned Income Tax Credit to counter the impact of technology displacement on consumer spending. Meanwhile, they are both adamantly opposed to a Basic Guaranteed Income for all because of moral hazard (incentive not to work) and the deleterious effect of idleness on individuals and society at large. While Martin Ford does agree with some public investment in education, infrastructure, science and basic research, contrary to Brynjolfsson and McAfee, he strongly supports the implementation of a massive Basic Guaranteed Income for all (qualified individuals) of at least $10,000. He views this as inevitable since otherwise consumer spending will get wiped out due to technological unemployment. He is not worried about the moral hazard of lowering individuals incentive to work since there will be not enough work to be had anyway.Ultimately, Martin Ford in his analysis of the situation is much more convincing than Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee. Yet I thought both their books (“Race Against The Machine” and “The Second Machine”) were formidable. But, they both claimed to be technology-optimists. Their positive recommendations were the weakest part of their respective books. Martin Ford, on his part, comes across as a technology-objectivist. He calls a spade a spade. And, he makes no artificial bias effort to dilute his diagnostic by making hopeful recommendations that he does not consider realistic.There is just a remaining flaw in all these authors recommendation. And, that is that they all don’t fully factor or express the fiscal constraints (the US and other countries are under). The US fiscal position is already unsustainable. With the existing structure of social entitlements (very modest in scale vs. proposed Basic Guaranteed Income) the US prospective Budget Deficits are unsustainable. And, they lead to the US Debt/GDP ratio to nearly double from just under 80% currently to 150% by 2047 (CBO projection). Adding on an additional huge social entitlement (Basic Income) that would increase Federal Government spending by over 50% is just not realistic.The above does not detract much from the overall quality of these outstanding books, and especially of this one book reviewed.

I read a ton of books, and cite/excerpt/link them on my main blog (Blog.KHIT.org). Rarely have I encountered one as oddly enjoyable as this one. Amiably well-written, amply documented, throwing down clear logic, and plausible scenario conjectures (based on his -- always guarded -- interpretations of his broad and deep documentation).Humans seem to be sleepwalking into a future regarding which they are largely unprepared. Will we slide into a dystopian techno-neo-feudalism when the jobs largely evaporate across nearly all sectors, including the cognitive arena "knowledge worker" domains thought to be relatively bulletproof? We are all in this together -- much as our narcissistic one-tenth-of-one-percenters like to deny it. "Wealth" is a relative thing, much as they prefer to deny it.My initial interest in this book (based on an NPR interview I heard) was that of his take on health care (my area -- Health IT), which I will be writing up forthwith. But, the larger problem is equally if not moreso compelling. How will we all "earn our keep" if reliable employment diminishes by half or more, regardless of our skills and initiative? Are we headed for "Elysium"?Or worse?

, by Martin Ford PDF
, by Martin Ford EPub
, by Martin Ford Doc
, by Martin Ford iBooks
, by Martin Ford rtf
, by Martin Ford Mobipocket
, by Martin Ford Kindle

, by Martin Ford PDF

, by Martin Ford PDF

, by Martin Ford PDF

, by Martin Ford PDF